🔗 Share this article

Iran is ready to restart atomic negotiations with the United States as long as it is approached with "respect" and "honor", Tehran's top diplomat has declared.

Abbas Araghchi declared only diplomacy produced results, and shared fresh requests had been made by mediators to restart discussions with the American leadership. He asserted Iran possessed no unreported enrichment locations, and Tehran had not yet reached a point to authorize the global atomic watchdog to access attacked atomic facilities for protective measures.

Navigating a Challenging Route

Araghchi is navigating a challenging course since Iran aims to avoid be perceived to be proceeding from a stance of disadvantage, and he consistently maintained that Iran had come out stronger in military terms and psychologically from the joint assault on its nuclear sites in June.

He was addressing at a security conference in Tehran where he restated that Iran had "a fundamental entitlement to enrich uranium domestically that it will always maintain" – the key factor of the stalemate in the previous talks.

Prior Discussions Abruptly Ended

The previous five rounds of discussions between the US and Iran were ended suddenly and hostile termination on 12 June when the Israeli government, with American backing, struck Tehran's atomic facilities in a two-week conflict that concluded with the US president declaring the facilities had been destroyed. Afterward, Western states employed their right to reinstate UN-wide sanctions, but Iran insists they have not had a substantial consequence.

Ideal Resolution Proposed

Iran's diplomats stated they felt they had attained a "magic solution" to the uranium processing matter in previous talks, when it was decided an domestic cooperative with US participation could enrich uranium. The two nations would have been able to declare success since domestic enrichment would have remained and the US could be assured that Iran's atomic project was solely for peaceful purposes.

It had not been agreed in the negotiations that US nuclear scientists could function within Iranian territory, but that was a logical implication of the consortium proposal. Diplomats asserted three times they had secured an understanding with the US representative the US official only for the arrangement to collapse due to "opponents in the US".

Present Status

Iran's diplomats stated the cooperative arrangement was now no longer available, but it seems very probable the proposal could be revived in some form if talks resume.

Trump last week stated he had been receiving messages that Iran sought to resume discussions, but in private Iran's diplomats state they are not yet obtaining consistent overtures from Washington either directly or from key regional mediators, such as the Qatari government, the Egyptian leadership, Oman and the Saudi kingdom. The Iranian foreign ministry has been criticized of non-responsiveness in the wake of Washington's unmediated tactics, but Tehran states diplomacy is not part of a spectacle.

Negotiating Standpoint

In his remarks to the forum, aimed to portray the US as a dominant force that exploits the notion of global regulations, Araghchi said the 12-day war showed the conflict could not be resolved by armed force. He asserted the assaults began with a Washington's ultimatum for an complete Tehran capitulation and culminated with an absolute demand for a ceasefire.

Iran is assured the opening assaults from Tel Aviv were executed with full US knowledge and cooperation, making trust challenging to reestablish.

Diplomacy Continues the Final Resolution

The foreign minister stated: "It was not Iran that had abandoned dialogue; it was America and the western countries that had consistently sought to dictate their will during the negotiations. Diplomacy can still be alive and remains the final resolution to settle disagreements, but its requirements, guidelines and tenets must be followed."

"Provided that they talk to the citizens of Tehran with the tone of dignity and respect, they will get a response in the equivalent approach."

Recovery and Reconstruction

In what is described by Iranian officials as the battle of restoration and recovery, Araghchi said he was assured Iran's security strengths "are considerably enhanced than preceding 13 or 14 June of this year. All our capabilities have been reestablished. We gained multiple understandings from this conflict; we have discovered our personal limitations and the shortcomings of the adversary."

He added: "We successfully passed this conflict. Our enrichment knowledge, which they planned to eliminate, stays intact. The facilities and gear, if damaged, will be reconstructed; what is important is the resolve of the citizens of Tehran and then the unity of the country that they targeted, but did not succeed to destroy. The citizens of Tehran have developed stronger, more united, and more backing of the administration and the state in the wake of this attack."